Summer Edition Of A Newsletter For Prisoners

The Parole Board's mission is to assess an individual's readiness for release based on whether they have been fully "corrected" and rehabilitated during their Department of Corrections stay, and not to base their judgment on the seriousness of the crime or on the wishes of the original prosecutor or the family members of the victim. Victims and their families deserve every possible form of restitution, but not mere  revenge.

 HARDTIME VIRGINIA Summer 2026 Vol. 11, No. 2

 An occasional newsletter by and for the incarcerated, Harvey Yoder, editor 

What’s Up With The New Parole Board?
     Most of us were hopeful that the newly appointed Parole Board sworn in in March would be more generous in offering release to deserving men and women in prison. In its first official (April) report, however, it reported on the cases of only two persons, neither of them interested in parole, apparently determining they would be better off waiting until they were to have a clean discharge. In May the Board noted eight persons being continued on parole and on four having their parole revoked, with only two releases granted, each because of a terminal illness.  
     While this may seem puzzling, my understanding after talking with others with the same concerns is that the board is getting themselves set up with a process for making the best possible decisions while receiving a lot of new information to train themselves, as none of them have ever done this before. I know they’ve been interviewing incarcerated folks, just not making final decisions until they have a better understanding. They had also requested that the full implementation of the HB1030 bill creating objective criteria on which to base a release be in place  a year later to give them more time to get that into their system and to fully comply with its provisions.
    The reality of having a whole new board after the last one only said 'no' is that it requires five new people to learn what to do without anyone having any prior experience, and it has taken even more time because they are actually making a point to receive input from advocates and returning citizens in a way that has never been done before. 
    Three representatives from our Valley Justice Coalition, for example, were able to meet with members of the board for an hour last month via Zoom to share our concerns. So there is reason to believe a little delay now is better than a bunch of rushed decisions. With their jobs and the administration's reputation on the line, they will more likely resort to 'no' when hurried.

Governor Spanberger’s Press Conference Offers New Hope
      In a June 23 news conference with DOC Director Joseph Walters and Secretary of Public Safety Stanley Meadors, Governor Spanberger noted significant improvements in DOC stats on incidences of violence, lockdowns, drug overdoses, and the use of solitary confinement. She also used this occasion to announce the formation of a Governor's Community Partnership Council on Corrections https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evnFkzYhed8.
     A major issue she did not address, however, was the need to reduce the number of persons incarcerated in the commonwealth, numbers which are causing a strain on a system lacking in necessary financial and personnel resources.

VDOC Posts “Second Chance Stories” on YouTube
     Three of us from the Valley Justice Coalition recently met with DOC Director Joseph Walters and nine of his staff for a conversation about prison reform. One of the ideas we suggested was that VDOC create a website highlighting the successes of individual “graduates” from the Commonwealth’s “School of Corrections.” None of us really expected this to be taken seriously, so we were pleasantly surprised to learn that Walters almost immediately directed a member of his staff to work on this. The result is 20 video-recordings by incarceration survivors, stories that inspire hope and will hopefully add to the public’s willingness to support second chances.

From The Editor’s Mailbag
• David Annarelli at Haynesville had a piece published in the recent Georgetown University’s American Criminal Law Review. He also has frequent commentaries on prisonradio.org and has his own website at https://davidannarelli.substack.com/
• Jeff Smith at Buckingham has drafted a bill to amend the code of Virginia by adding a section establishing a Second Look Resentencing Review for individuals serving life sentences for non-homocide offenses.
• David Carmichael at Lawrenceville has also drafted a bill, one that would provide for new work release and furlough provisions for deserving people, noting that  people who are able to enter society with a portfolio are far less likely to recidivate after their release.
• Charles Zellers, Sr. at Deerfield is seeking someone on the outside to build a small dwelling on a rural property his sisters have acquired in Lunenberg County.  He hopes to develop a community of homes on the property for incarceration survivors.
• Steve Colosi at Buckingham has created a “Roadmap to a Successful Parole Interview,”emphasizing factors like maintaining good posture and eye contact, accepting responsibility, expressing remorse, being precise and to the point in answering questions, and avoiding playing the victim or assuming the Board will be persuaded by stressing your family’s need for you or how much you deserve release.
• Shawn Weneta, a formerly incarcerated individual and a professional consultant, provided his Richmond Times column about the looming crisis in healthcare costs the DOC faces with a rapidly growing geriatric prison.

• William Thorpe, who has spent years in solitary confinement and has been transferred to a Texas prison, is advocating for a mandatory review of all sentences after a determined number of years.

Harvey Yoder, Valley Justice Coalition, P.O. Box 434, Harrisonburg, VA 22803

DN-R Justice Matters Column Promotes Reform

Delegate Tony Wilt's bill HB1030, requires the Virginia Parole Board to use objective criteria in determining eligibility for release. As noted above, it would not add any taxpayer expense, but would help free tons of tax dollars by releasing people who are no longer a threat to public safety.

Debra Turner, legislative advisor for the Valley Justice Coalition, wrote the following Justice Matters column published in today's Daily News-Record:

Delegate Tony Wilt Files A Groundbreaking Parole Bill

Remember how important the dreaded report card was when we were in school? Even now, as adults, we endure job performance evaluations in which we are evaluated based on preset criteria, and expect to receive either the benefits of, or the penalties for, our performance.

But what if no matter how well we performed, we never received the benefits, and were continually penalized for offenses committed 20 or 30 years ago?

Del. Tony Wilt and the Valley Justice Coalition believe that those who have committed crimes and are eligible for parole should be able to meet measurable criteria for release. The Virginia Parole Board’s mission is to “release (those) compatible with public safety.” Unfortunately, the Parole Board has failed to live up to its mission statement.

Many citizens are unaware that the State of Virginia eliminated parole in 1995. However, there are still several thousand individuals who are grandfathered under the old parole laws and continue to be eligible to earn parole. Of those potential parolees, only 26 were granted parole in 2025. That is a grant rate of less than 1%. How could such a performance rating system seem fair?

With insightful ideas from two detainees at the Lawrenceville Correctional Center, Delegate Wilt has filed House Bill 1030 with discretionary parole eligibility guidelines. This bill includes a checklist of 10 measurable criteria for parole release, such as being infraction free, length of time served, age at time of offense, and verified home and work plans. Those who are parole eligible gain or lose points based on their individual incarceration histories. Anyone who has a total score of 25 points or less receives no hearing and a negative consideration. Anyone who has a total score of 50+ points, is guaranteed a hearing and positive consideration. This would not guarantee release, but the Parole Board would need to provide an individualized written explanation for any failure to follow the recommendation indicated by the checklist score.

With the passage of HB1030, the Parole Board would finally be held accountable for a release rate of less than 1%. Their current explanations for a parole denial often include “release at this time would diminish the seriousness of the crime,” or “has an extensive criminal record.” These are subjective assessments rather than being based on the clear data that a checklist of criteria would generate.

No matter how extensive or serious, past crimes can never be changed. What matters, after many years of incarceration, are the positive changes that are demonstrated by the individual. What have they done, or not done, to show they are no longer a danger to public safety? Only by examining their carceral history through the completion of an objective checklist can the Parole Board justify their decision to grant or not to grant parole.

On Saturday, Jan. 17, Virginia inaugurated our 75th governor. As I listened to Governor Spanberger’s inaugural speech, one word was highlighted over and over. Affordability. Virginia is facing a period of fiscal challenge that will require bipartisan cooperation. For example, our economy has suffered tremendous loss of income after the elimination of 24,000 federal jobs. We will need to economize in every area possible to make up for this lost revenue.

Consider the currently 1200 eligible for geriatric parole, being sixty years old or older. Due to overly long sentences and an aging prison population, this number is expected to rise by more than 40% in the next few years. The independent watchdog group JLARC reports that 2% of Virginia’s prison population uses nearly 20% of the Department of Corrections healthcare funds. This aging population needs specialized health care that costs the taxpayer an average of $70,000 per person per year. The cost is enormous and will only continue to grow.

Ask yourself this question. Can Virginia continue to morally and financially support a system that warehouses individuals who could be safely returned to family and friends? The answer is a resounding NO.

The Valley Justice Coalition would like to thank Delegate Wilt for attempting to improve this system by filing HB1030 Discretionary Parole Eligibility Guidelines.

Monthly Justice Matters columns are provided by members of the Valley Justice Coalition, a local citizen voice for criminal justice reform in our community and in the Commonwealth since 2014.

HARDTIME VIRGINIA Fall 2025 Vol. 10, No. 3

An occasional newsletter by and for the incarcerated, Thanksgiving edition.

Voting Rights Restored by Virginia's Last Four Governors

Bob McDonnell (R) 2010–2014  10,000 Made rights restoration automatic for nonviolent felons who completed their sentence and any probation or parole.

Terry McAuliffe (D) 2014–2018  173,000  The Virginia Supreme Court blocked his attempt to issue a blanket order, so he began a streamlined, individualized review process for people who had completed their sentences.

Ralph Northam (D) 2018–2022  126,000  Removed the requirement for felons to complete parole or probation before having their rights restored.

Glenn Youngkin (R) 2022–2026  fewer that 4,000  Ended the automatic restoration process and returned to a case-by-case review, which has significantly slowed the pace of restorations.

Parole Board Grants Zero Releases in September

Of nearly 200 cases reviewed members of the Board were unable to find a single person they felt the VDOC had actually “corrected,” not even among those eligible for geriatric release. They did revoke the parole of four persons, however. Meanwhile, some men at Lawrenceville have come up with a 14-point rating scale that would give the Board a more objective way of making their decisions. Our Valley Justice Coalition has submitted these criteria to our local delegate, who is considering drafting it into a bill to be presented in the General Assembly in January. We’re praying for a positive result, and will keep you posted.

From the Mailbag

Regardless of the circumstances and conflicting emotions of our lives, God wants us to practice gratitude, knowing it will remind us of His love and power and enhance the quality of our lives. To Kingsway Prison and Family Outreach, I express my gratitude: Not only are they supplying me with spiritual guidance in the absence of our prison chaplain, they are assisting me in typing my first publication. Thanks! - Minor Junior Smith (legally blind), Deerfield Correctional Center

I proudly told my interviewer I had been in self-imposed sobriety on 3/3/01. I was floored when he told me my record showed I tested positive for opiates in 2019. It took me two years to finally got it cleared from my file. I had received Narco from Medical for radiation burns from throat cancer treatment.” - Daniel Leneave, Lawrenceville Correctional Center

I know good and respectful men here with over 50 years in prison. A friend of mine, Charles Zellers, had Covid and will have to be on oxygen all his life. Another friend, Minor Smith, is blind. Medical costs are going up, with prisons filled with old people. What could they do to hurt anyone?                            - Kenneth Pack Buckingham Correctional Center

Milestones by Friends on my Mail List

Steve Colosi and Thomas Reed-Bey, earned degrees, Greg Widener was granted parole earlier this year, and sadly, Henry Gorham, Jr., 69, died of cancer at the Greensville Correctional Center on July 10, one day after being denied release for health reasons. He had served 30 years.

A Much Appreciated Get Well Card From Friends at LCC

I was humbled and deeply grateful for a card signed by some good men at Lawrenceville Correctional Center. It arrived on the day before my surgery at UVA, where I had a small malignant tumor and a couple of lymph nodes removed from my neck. Nothing appears to have spread, so thanks for your prayers! 

Dear Harvey Yoder, May God's grace and mercy strengthen you every day. You are in our prayers on behalf of the men here. - David Carmichael

My friend, My prayer for you is that God has already healed you!   -Brother A. Parker

Our thoughts and prayers go out to you in hope of a blessed healing. God bless you! -R. Robinson

Dear Harvey Yoder, May Allah continue to bless you in your struggle, and overcome it. I would like to thank you for your help!  - Muwakki S. B. Shabazzz

ou are in our prayers, Mr. Yoder. Hope you are doing okay and God looks obver you and your family and all of us. Take care, and God bless.  - Tim Rankin

Thanks for your love and work for us! God bless.  -Randy Clark

"When Jesus heard that, he said, 'This sickness is not unto death, but for the glory of God, that the Son of Man might be glorified through it.'" My dear brother and friend, You are always a shining light on my path and a sweet blessing in this journey of life. I pray daily for your healing. Thank you for being that special person in my life. Amen!  - Jonathan White

Mr. Yoder, May God bless you in all all you do on our behalf.  - Darrell Willis

The LORD is with you, mighty man of God. Be encouraged and know he is by your side. - Brother Lopez

You are in my thoughts and prayers. Thank you for all your labor. By Jesus's stripes you are healed. Be blessed. Carl 😋

"For I will restore health to you, and will heal you of your wounds, says the Lord."

 JEREMIAH 30:17

Praying that the light

of God's presence

will chase away

every shadow of illness.

Wishing You

Health and Happiness!

****************************************

Editor Harvey Yoder co-chairs the Valley Justice Coalition, P.O. Box 434, Harrisonburg, VA 22803. He welcomes letters, and may sometimes quote from them unless you say otherwise.

Petitioning For A Model Criminal Justice System

If you are a Virginia resident, please add your name and zip code to the petition below  or feel free to print copies, gather signatures and mail them to VJC, P.O. Box 434 , Harrisonburg, VA 22803 by November 15.

When I was in college in the sixties, some fellow students and I made regular visits to the former jail at 60 Graham Street, which had a capacity of around 60 men and a small cell for several women. Our experiences with Sheriff Strawderman and his staff, and especially with those in his jail, forever changed my life.

Thirty years later, in 1995, our community opened a new jail at 25 South Liberty Street, designed for 250 inmates. But in less than three decades after it opened, the new facility had been double bunked to hold as many as 400, with up to an additional 200 housed at the Middle River Regional Jail in Verona.

While those numbers have leveled off since COVID, something about that dramatic increase just didn’t seem right to many of us, which led to the formation of the Valley Justice Coalition, a citizens group focused on alternatives to incarceration. 

We wondered why, with our local census numbers increasing only around 55% since 1965 (much of that due to JMU’s rapid growth), our jail numbers skyrocketed by over 600% during that period? Were we really seeing that much more crime? And are Americans in general so much more criminal than other industrialized nations in the world that have far, far lower rates of incarceration?

Much of that increase can be attributed to a rise in drug related sentences, which is why we have fully supported Commonwealth’s Attorney Marsha Garst’s efforts in establishing a Drug Court and a Day Reporting alternative to incarceration for those with substance use disorders. 

We also applaud Sheriff Bryan Hutcheson for supporting mental health services in jail and for providing educational tablets for inmates. The tablets offer music and other entertainment that can be accessed by individuals only after availing themselves of a set number of educational and self-improvement classes on these devices. With over 90% of the jail population being repeat offenders, the sheriff hopes, in the words of Marsha Garst, to operate with more of a greenhouse mentality rather than a warehouse mentality.

We were also pleased to collaborate with Delegate Tony Wilt in his championing legislation to create a Public Defender’s Office for our community last year, through a bill he co-sponsored with Delegate Sam Rasoul, a Democrat. Good representation in court for those unable to afford an attorney can result not only in more just sentences but also in less time and money spent in costly appeals.

In a recent Zoom conversation with Delegate Wilt and Virginia Department of Corrections Director Chadwick Dotson, we were able to share our concerns about the fact that the Virginia Parole Board, whose mission is “to grant parole or conditional release to those inmates whose release is compatible with public safety,” actually released only 30 persons in 2024, many of those due to serious health problems. We noted that for the first time ever, there are more aged and often ailing individuals eligible for geriatric release than for all other current categories combined, creating astronomical healthcare costs for taxpayers in the Commonwealth. And according to the Parole Board’s most recent report, it granted not even one release last month. Has our Department of Corrections failed to correct even a single one of the nearly 200 cases the Board reviewed in September?

We also recently had retired professor Howard Zehr as a guest at one of our recent VJC meetings, someone  known worldwide for his pioneering work in Restorative Justice alternatives to typically adversarial court processes. Our local Fairfield Center is ready and able to facilitate this kind of process, one in which offenders meet with their victims to work out plans for making satisfactory restitution to repair harms rather than simply being prescribed a punishment and denied the right--and the responsibility--to make things right.

None of these alternatives represent being “soft on crime,” but rather our becoming more “smart on crime,” and more effective in actually correcting wrongdoers, which is what a Department of Corrections should be all about.

So in the interest of promoting a model criminal justice system in the Commonwealth, the Valley Justice Coalition is launching a petition in support of policies we believe are in every citizen’s best interest, regardless of their political leanings, as follows:

We favor the creation of an ever more just and effective criminal justice system, one that supports:

• Rehabilitation over mere punishment.
• Restorative justice alternatives that give high priority to victims' needs for reparation and restitution by offenders.
• Supervised release for aging and thoroughly rehabilitated persons behind bars.

In the spirit of the prophet Micah, we believe we are all required to not only do justice, but  to love mercy and together walk humbly with our just and merciful God. 

The Virginia Parole Board-- A Modest Proposal

According to the Virginia Parole Board's website, they
have carried out this mission only once so far in 2025.

Fact #1: In 1995 parole was replaced with Truth in Sentencing legislation that required at least 85% of a sentence being served before one could be released from prison. However, there are still nearly 3500 men and women in the Commonwealth who are parole eligible, including those who were incarcerated before the 1995 law was passed and those sentenced as juveniles. Half of the total are also eligible for geriatric release due to their age and time served.

Fact #2: The Virginia Parole Board, consisting of five members appointed by the governor, has a support staff of between 40-50 persons and an annual operating budget of over $2.8 million.

Fact #3: The Board's stated mission is “to protect public safety and contribute to a fair and effective justice system by ensuring that persons who remain a threat to society remain incarcerated and those who no longer present a risk are released to become productive citizens.”

Fact #4: Yet according to the 2025 numbers posted on the Board's official website, only one person, a geriatric case, has been granted release so far this year. One.

Is our Department of Corrections failing to correct the over 20,000 men and women its charge, at a cost of over $1.5 billion annually? Or is the Parole Board not carrying out its mission?

In any case, scores of parole eligible individuals are being denied release year after year, in spite of their 1) maintaining infraction-free records while incarcerated, 2) taking every vocational and self-improvement class possible, 3) serving as mentors and role models in their pods and work places and 4) even earning college degrees behind bars. Many lament that had they been sentenced by “truth in sentencing” guidelines, they would have already been released, without any parole board action.

For those eligible, parole examiners make a recommendation to the board based on both a meeting they have with an individual and an examination of their record, after which cases are voted on by at least three, or depending on the sentence, four, of the five board members in a video meeting. The stated reasons posted for their “not grant” verdicts appear to be computer-generated, as in the following actual example from the website:

Release at this time would diminish seriousness of crime; History of violence; Crimes committed - Kidnap/Abduct, Kidnap/Abduct; Extensive criminal record; Considering your offense and your institutional records, the Board concludes that you should serve more of your sentence before being paroled; The Board concludes that you should serve more of your sentence prior to release on parole; Serious nature and circumstances of your offense(s).

If there are other factors affecting Board decisions, such as resistance from victim families or from a Commonwealth’s Attorney office, that information is not made public.

The Valley Justice Coalition strongly favors Virginia rejoining the majority of states who see that it is in tax-payer’s best interest to have a fully functioning parole system. Mississippi, for example, one of 16 states that once abolished parole, reinstated it in 2021, realizing that the prospect of earning an early release is a powerful incentive for doing well.

We also favor legislation proposed by numerous groups, including by some parole eligible individuals I know, that would create specific criteria for determining whether to grant release. 

Here are 14 items one such group has put together that would create a “Scored Parole Eligibility Level” of either One (75-100 points), Two (60-74 points), or Three (0-59 points), based on the following criteria:

1. PRIOR OFFENSE HISTORY IN VDOC: None (2 points) 2-3 One (-1), Two (-3), Four or More (-4)

2. HISTORY OF INSTITUTIONAL VIOLENCE WITHIN THE PAST FIVE YEARS: None (0), Assault not involving the use of a weapon (-5), Assault involving the use of a weapon (-10)

3. POSITIVE DRUG TEST IN THE PAST 60 MONTHS CONVICTION: None (0), One (-2), Two or more (-4)

4. POSITIVE ALCOHOL TEST IN THE PAST 60 MONTHS CONVICTION: None (0), Two or more (-2)

5. LENGTH OF TIME SERVED: 5 years (3), 10 years (4), 15 years (5), 20 years (8), 25 years (12), 30 years or more (14)

6. THE INMATE ADMITS TO THEIR ACTION IN THE CRIME FOR WHICH THEY ARE CONVICTED: No (0), Yes, (10)

7. THE INMATE COMPLETED THE REQUIRED AMOUNT OF TIME TO QUALIFY FOR DISCRETIONARY PAROLE (Old law, Juvenile, Fishback, Three Strike) OR GERIATRIC PAROLE: 

Discretionary (10), Geriatric (5)

8. THE INMATE HAS OBTAINED THEIR G.E.D. OR HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA, OR IS ENROLLED IN A G.E.D. CLASS: No (0), Yes (10)

9. THE INMATE HAS COMPLETED A VOCATIONAL, TRADE OR JOURNEYMANSHIP, OR IS CURRENTLY ENROLLED: No  (0), YES (10)

10. THE INMATE IS CURRENTLY ENROLLED OR HAS COMPLETED A MENTAL HEALTH/THERAPEUTIC PROGRAM, PROGRAMS: None (0), Yes (10)

11. THE  INMATE PARTICIPATED IN ALL WORK PROGRAMMING OR HAS APPLIED FOR A JOB IN THE LAST 60 MONTHS: No (0), Yes (10)

12. THE INMATE ADHERED TO ANY THERAPY REQUIREMENTS IN THE PAST 60 MONTHS BY ENROLLING ON THE WAITING LIST: No (0), Yes (10)

13. A) THE INMATE COMPLETED THE VADOC COMPASS TEST, AND IF SCORED HIGH RISK FOR RECIDIVISM, AGREES TO ANKLE MONITORING AS A CONDITION FOR PAROLE: No (-5), Yes (5)

B) THE INMATE COMPLETED THE VADOC COMPASS TEST AND SCORED LOW FOR RECIDIVISM: Yes (10)

14.CURRENT AGE: Under 21 (0), 21-29 (1), 30-39 (2), 40-49 (3), 50 and older (4)

We urge members of the General Assembly to consider this or similar legislation that would help Virginia become a model state for best practices in criminal justice.

Update September 2025: Hats off to Delegate Tony Wilt, who is working at introducing a version of the above at the upcoming General Assembly.

This year's Christmas newsletter to some of my incarcerated friends

    Holy and Happy Holidays!__

HARDTIME VIRGINIA, Vol. 9, No. 3                                     December, 2024

an occasionaol newsletter by and for Virginia prisoners

Sadly, Not Many Will Be Home For Christmas

Charles Zellers at Deerfield CC  writes: "I’ve been away from my family for 31 Christmases. Not being with my loved ones never gets any easier. I miss them very much. They used to visit me on holidays and we would eat sandwiches and snacks from a vending machine in the visiting room, but the DOC no longer permits that. Anyone used to be allowed to visit, but now my children are not even permitted to bring my grandchildren to visit me because of my offenses nearly 32 years ago. I have been parole eligible since July 30, 2005. I've not had a write-up March 1, 2000, but I'm continually being denied. How many times am I going to be punished for the same offenses?"

 

Jonathan White at Lawrenceville CC laments that here have been only 16 releases granted by the Virginia Parole Board from January through October of 2024, as follows: Discretionary parole, 4; Geriatric parole, 7; Dual parole: 2; Terminally ill medical release: 3.

Two Organizations Accuse Parole Board Of Policy Violations

In a letter dated October 14, 2024 the Virginia ACLU alleges the Virginia Parole Board is in violation of Va. Code § 53.1-136, which states they are to “Convene a public meeting . . . when conducting the final deliberation and vote regarding whether the Board will grant parole to a prisoner. The prisoner being considered for parole or his attorney shall be permitted to attend such meeting either, in the Board's discretion, in person or via video conference…”

The letter goes on to say, “Further, whereas the Virginia Code previously required the Board to conduct a thorough investigation into each person being considered for parole, HB 2169 / SB 1361 provided that: All information collected through such investigation shall be made available to the prisoner or his attorney, provided that (i) neither the prisoner nor his attorney shall further disclose, reproduce, copy, or disseminate such information in any way and (ii) the Board shall redact all personal information of the victim. Va. Code § 53.1-155. 

 

Also, according to Karen Morrison, founding member and president of Fighting 4 Freedom, there have been 140 parole eligible applicants from August to September who have had only two Board members voting on their cases, specifically those who are serving life for homicide crimes. Given the fact that some members never grant parole releases in such cases, this is not likely to affect the outcome, but it is nevertheless contrary to official Board policy.

Wise and Encouraging Words From Two Men at Lawrencevillle

 

“Why do we spend our whole lives running from problems, sadness, hurt, and pain? God has promised all of us PEACE, JOY, and HAPPINESS, as we keep FAITH, HOPE, and LOVE in our hearts. Jesus himself went through misery.”                                        - John Crider

“Unlike people who waste their time being miserable... build and renew your character within you, because today is the day you can be your very best YOU, even when Christmas in prison seems to be no more than a gift in a empty box.”                         - Jonathan White 

The Startling Story of the Stolen Stihl

I gave myself the gift of a brand new chain saw back in 2009, a smooth running Stihl 250.

Some months later, just before Christmas, we had one of the heaviest snow storms ever. Soon thereafter, on a cold day while I was at work, a friendly stranger came to our door and asked my wife if he could shovel out our lower drive--for a modest fee. Among other things, he explained, he had just been awarded visitation of his ten-year-old son and needed some extra cash to buy him some things for Christmas.

While my kindhearted spouse had never met the man before, he seemed pleasant enough, and we did need more parking space cleared for holiday guests. So why not have him remove the snow, she thought, to surprise me and to do a needy person a favor?

“Just return the shovel to the utility room when you’re finished,” she said, “and I’ll have your money waiting for you there in an envelope.”

Meanwhile, she went about her work and only occasionally checked to see how he was doing. A phone call she received near the time he was finishing prevented her from actually seeing him leave, but when she checked everything out, she found the lower driveway clean, our shovel back in its place and the payment gone, so she felt satisfied that all was well. She also excused herself for the extra generous payment she had left for him. After all, it was Christmas.

When I came home that evening and learned about my wife's surprise move, I assured her it was fine. Whether or not his story was entirely true, I figured, it's always better to err on the side of generosity.

It was not until the next morning that I discovered my new chain saw, stored in the aforementioned utility room and with the word "stihl" emblazoned on it in bold letters, was missing. Just plain gone, nowhere to be found.

My wife was devastated, in spite of my assurances that a chain saw was quite replaceable, and that she needn’t be hard on herself. I also promised I would report the missing saw in case it showed up in a pawn shop somewhere and could be recovered. “Maybe I just loved my new toy a little too much,” I joked.

Much to our surprise, the sheriff’s deputy assigned to the case showed up with the stolen Stihl the very next day, Christmas Eve Day. “Here’s your saw,” he said, “Merry Christmas. And just to let you know, the gentleman who took it will be spending his holiday in jail.” Which seemed fair enough, on one hand, but we couldn't help feeling sorry for anyone having to be behind bars at this special time of the year.

But the story doesn’t end there. Over the next year we had a series of conversations and an exchange of letters with our unexpected friend. We learned he had earned the position of “trusty” in his jail pod and was scheduled to be released December 24, 2010, exactly a year after being locked up for stealing my Stihl.

In one of his letters he wrote, “Yes, it's a blessing to be leaving here on Christmas Eve. It makes me feel special to know God has plans for me.”

Among those plans was to spend his first months of freedom at Gemeinschaft Home, a local recovery and re-entry program for ex-offenders, Upon release he, like so many others who have ever been incarcerated, faced the daunting task of finding a job, a decent place to live and the kind of treatment and support network people need to remain free of their addictions.

I say, "God, please bless them every one."     

Harvey Yoder, editor