Now That We've Replaced Virginia's State Song, Could Adopt A More Appropriate State Seal?

Note the image of the goddess Virtue and the motto ("So be it ever to Tyrants") on the Virginia state seal. This photo was taken at a recent meeting two fellow members of the Valley Justice Coalition and I had with Director Joseph Walters and some of his Department of Corrections staff in Richmond. As I reflected on  the seal I was struck by the unintended impression it might give of the DOC oppressing and punishing the incarcerated rather than effectively correcting and rehabilitating them.

Nathaniel Fairfield, an expert in all things technological, used AI to create an alternative state seal for me that might be a more appropriate for the Commonwealth. Unfortunately, "Sic Semper Humilatio," translated literally as "Thus Ever Humbled,"  is not quite what I was looking for, so I thought I would ask AI (a tool I normally avoid like the plague) to create yet another possible seal. 

I instructed AI to have the two figures in this version be "persons of color" (non-white), but this is what I got, with  the words "Mercy and Justice" on the top and "Ita Semper Progentibus" at the bottom, or "Thus Ever For Those Who Need." 

In any case, I'm showing these only for the sake of getting your suggestions. I would definitely not want Virtue to be portrayed as a white person showing benevolence toward a descendant of slaves.

I welcome your comments and suggestions below.

The Amazing, Miraculous Passage Of HB1030

None of us dreamed this would pass both the House and Senate without a single opposing vote.

Early last year my friend Jonathan White at the Lawrenceville Correctional Center contacted some of us with the Valley Justice Coalition about a project he and his friend David Carmichael had been working on for well over a year. 

White and Carmichael, still eligible for parole, having been incarcerated before 1995, the year parole was abolished in Virginia, created a draft of a bill that would provide objective criteria the parole board would be required to use in evaluating eligibility for release. The two, like multitudes of others in Virginia’s prisons, had themselves been denied parole year after year based on such things as “the seriousness of the crime” and other factors they were powerless to do anything about.

So they came up with a list of factors with point values resulting in a numerical score that would help determine an individual’s eligibility for release. These included such things as length of time served, numbers of classes and groups participated in, years of being infraction-free while incarcerated, and having a satisfactory home plan for release. Anyone with a high (good) score but being denied parole would have to be provided with a written statement of explanation.

With copies of the proposed bill in hand, several of us met with Delegate Tony Wilt last fall to ask whether he would be willing to sponsor such legislation in the 2026 General Assembly, just as he had successfully done the previous year with a bill to provide for a Public Defender’s Office for our community. After some discussion he agreed to at least give it some careful consideration. His capable assistant, Chad Funkhouser, then did some further research on the possibility and came back with an affirmative response, resulting in what became House Bill 1030.

Meanwhile we were able to get the support of formerly incarcerated community leaders, notably Kenneth Hunter of the Virginia Interfaith Center for Public Policy, David Smith of S.A.L.T., Rob Poggenklass of Justice Forward Virginia, and Taj Mahon-Haft and Shawn Waneta of the Humanization Project. Waneta made some helpful suggestions for changes in some of the wording and got positive responses from some members of the parole board. Even then we remained unsure of what reception the bill would get from other lawmakers in Richmond.

To our amazement, the bill passed through two House committees and the full House of Delegates without a single dissenting vote,. It then passed the Senate Rehabilitation and Social Services  Committee in a 19-0 vote, with the help of some good testimony by some of the above supporters. From there the bill went to the Senate with some minor wording changes that were incorporated in the final version. It then passed unanimously in a block vote in the Senate on Tuesday. From there it goes to Governor Spanberger for her signature.

Some 20 incarcerated persons have already written Delegate Wilt expressing their appreciation for his effort. And scores of deserving incarcerated men and women across Virginia are set to benefit from an increased opportunity to be reunited with their loved ones and have a second chance at making a positive contribution to their families and communities. Likewise, citizens across Virginia will benefit from having rehabilitated men and women added to the work force and paying taxes rather than requiring ever more tax dollars to house them in prison. Then there are the aging and ailing persons who can potentially receive care from members of their family and others on the outside, men and women who are clearly no longer a danger to their communities.

We see HB1030 as truly a miracle for which we praise God and offer thanks to the many who prayed and worked hard for its passage.

Here is the substance of the bill:

• § 53.1-151.1. Suitability for release on parole; discretionary parole criteria guidelines.

A. The Parole Board or staff designated by the Board shall use the information collected through the investigation required by § 53.1-155 to determine discretionary parole criteria guidelines when evaluating a prisoner's suitability for release on parole. The Department of Corrections shall assist to the fullest extent possible with requests for records.

B. A completed discretionary parole criteria worksheet shall be provided to the prisoner in advance of the parole hearing. If an eligible prisoner believes that his worksheet score is inaccurate, the prisoner shall be permitted to contest the worksheet score and to provide records necessary to correct such score prior to the Board's vote on the decision to grant parole. If the Parole Board finds the prisoner's contest is well-founded, the worksheet score shall be updated accordingly. Suitability for release on parole shall be computed using the schedule of discretionary parole criteria set out below:

SCHEDULE OF DISCRETIONARY PAROLE CRITERIA

1. Compliant with case plan: No: 0; Yes: 10

2. Major infraction within past five years: None: 0; Per major infraction: -10

3. Minor infraction within past five years: None: 0; Per minor infraction: -2

4. Applied for or enrolled in educational, vocational, or therapeutic program: No: 0: Yes: 5

5. Completed educational and vocational programs: Associate’s degree or above: 5; High school degree or GED: 5; Journeyman trade skill: 5; Vocational trade: 3

6. Verified residential plan: No: 0; Yes: 15

7. Previous state responsible incarceration: None: 0; per previous state responsible incarceration: -5

8. Length of time served; Per 10 years: 5

9. Age of offender at time of offense: 26 years of age or older: 0; 21-25 years of age: 5; 18-20 years of age: 10; 18 years of age or younger: 15

10. Verified employment plan: No: 0; Yes: 15

TOTAL OF SCORES: Tier 1: 50 or more points; Tier 2: 25-49 points; Tier 3: 0-25 points

C. A maximum of 10 points may be earned by a prisoner for satisfying the criteria listed in subdivision B 5, related to verified educational and vocational programs.

D. A maximum of 15 points may be earned by a prisoner for satisfying the criteria listed in subdivision B 6, related to a verified residential plan. Satisfaction of such criteria listed in subdivision B 6 requires the prisoner to provide a letter of verification.

E. A prisoner shall earn five points for every 10 years served, and there shall be no limit to the amount of points a prisoner may earn for satisfying the criteria listed in subdivision B 8, related to length of time served.

F. A prisoner shall earn 15 points for satisfying the criteria listed in subdivision B 10, related to a verified employment plan. Satisfaction of such criteria listed in subdivision B 10 requires the prisoner to provide a letter of verification. Any prisoner who is (i) permanently disabled or (ii) 65 years of age or older and retired shall receive the full amount of points under subdivision B 10.

G. If a prisoner's score is within the Tier 1 range, such prisoner shall receive favorable consideration for parole. If a prisoner's score is within the Tier 2 range, such prisoner may be considered a suitable candidate for parole. If a prisoner's score is within the Tier 3 range, such prisoner is presumed to be unsuitable for parole at the time of the hearing.

    If the Parole Board deviates from the recommendation based on the discretionary parole criteria worksheet score for a prisoner scored at Tier 1 or Tier 3, the Board shall provide a written explanation for such deviation.

    Nothing in this section shall prohibit the Board from making its final determination on whether or not to grant discretionary parole based on the individual facts and circumstances of the prisoner.

DN-R Monthly Justice Matters Column

The Valley Justice Coalition publishes a monthly Justice Matters 
column, this latest one being by two JMU students. 

Students Learn By Doing

How much do you know about what happens in our local courts from day to day?

As part of our Communities and Courts class at James Madison University, a number of us are spending time each week observing the courtroom, speaking with judges, watching cases unfold, and collecting data for the Community-Court Connection (C3) project, which is promoted locally by James Madison University and the Valley Justice Coalition. The purpose is to help us and our community better understand how the local justice system functions.

What we take away from this experience is more than what we could learn in a classroom. Each week, we observe the General District Court or Circuit Court for an hour, witnessing everything from traffic violations to felony cases. We take notes on interactions among individuals in the courtroom to better understand how each person’s role contributes to the system’s overall functioning. We also collect data on the number of charges, the types of offenses, courtroom procedures, and the presence or absence of legal representation, among other details, before recording the information on our online dataset.

Court-watching programs have become increasingly common throughout the country. According to a training conducted by the American Bar Association Section of Civil Rights and Social Justice, the goal is to reveal injustices within the court to the public and increase transparency. Observing court proceedings shows how case outcomes can vary depending on the court actors involved, as judges differ in their approaches and demeanors: some are more lenient and forgiving, while others are more formal and strict. Data on case outcomes show that different court actors involved can make a significant difference.

The connection between course materials and our real-life observations has challenged our assumptions about the fairness of the legal system. We have noted that the presence of attorneys from the new Harrisonburg and Rockingham County’s Public Defenders Office has had a positive effect on outcomes. Abigail Thibeault, Chief Public Defender, informed us that Harrisonburg has had such an office for just over a year now, and that until then, low-income individuals had to rely on court-appointed attorneys, often with limited time and resources.

While we have been told that overall crime rates have been declining, our local courts remain incredibly busy, especially with traffic and misdemeanor offenses. The data we collected for our class support this. Between September 23 and 28, for example, 17 students collectively observed 133 cases, despite each attending court for only an hour a week.

Our observations further confirmed that social constructs, such as economic inequality, shape legal outcomes. Individuals who lack the funds for an attorney often face longer delays, more uncertainty, and fewer options. According to our class data, around 374 individuals from our observation hours appeared in court without legal counsel. This means they either couldn’t afford representation or, as in many traffic or misdemeanor cases, representation didn’t seem necessary. But when representation is needed, the lack of representation can significantly affect case outcomes negatively for those charged.

Through observing the courts and gaining a deeper understanding of the justice system, we develop professional skills that will support our future careers. We strengthen our time management by fitting weekly court visits into our busy schedules and identifying which sessions are most productive. We have improved our communication skills by watching how judges, attorneys, police, and defendants interact professionally. We have also gained insight into ethical decision-making by seeing legal professionals balance courtroom rules with their own judgment. Such skills will directly shape our career paths in the justice field and our roles as engaged community members.

Our observations have highlighted many strengths within our local courts, such as organized, timely proceedings and the reliability of court interpreters. Court staff were knowledgeable and prepared, creating an efficient courtroom environment. However, securing legal representation for low-income individuals remains a barrier for many, so additional resources to reduce these inequalities will help ensure equity in the system.

Community volunteers are also being invited to take part in this ongoing project, which offers insight into how our local legal system works, broader perspectives about issues of legal injustice, and the importance of being an educated and engaged citizen.

Justice Matters columns are provided by the VJC, a local citizen voice for criminal justice reform in our community and in the Commonwealth since 2014. This one was written by JMU students Sydney Herrmann and Caroline Wright.

Going Bananas Over Injustice

Inflation hasn't seemed to affect the price of this exotic (non-native) fruit at our nearby Food Lion.

"Listen! Hear the cries of the wages of your field hands. These are the wages you stole from those who harvested your fields. The cries of the harvesters have reached the ears of the Lord of heavenly forces. You have lived a self-satisfying life on this earth, a life of luxury. You have stuffed your hearts in preparation for the day of slaughter." 

James 5:4-5 (CEB)

Have you ever wondered why we pay less for imported bananas than any other item in the produce section of our supermarkets? Or why we have to pay up to four times as much for apples or peaches, among the native products available to us (though even those are also often imported from distant countries)? 

One obvious reason is that wages and other operating costs are far lower elsewhere than those in the US. If we grew and marketed bananas here, the price would be far higher, even in cases where migrant workers are employed.

Sam Funkhouser, Princeton seminary graduate and member of an Old German Baptist group in Edinburg, in a keynote address at a November 15, 2025, workshop I attended, asked the question, "How many of the goods and products we take for granted could we afford if all who worked to make them possible were paid the wages we would expect for ourselves?"

Including the harvesting and shipping of bananas.

An informative article in the Wikipedia on "banana republics" describes some Central American and other countries as follows:

A banana republic is a country with an economy of state capitalism, where the country is operated as a private commercial enterprise for the exclusive profit of the ruling class. Typically, a banana republic has a society of extremely stratified social classes, usually a large impoverished working class and a ruling class plutocracy, composed of the business, political, and military elites.The ruling class controls the primary sector of the economy by exploiting labor. Such exploitation is enabled by collusion between the state and favored economic monopolies, in which the profit, derived from the private exploitation of public lands, is private property. At the same time, the debts incurred thereby are the financial responsibility of the public treasury. Therefore, the term banana republic is a pejorative descriptor for a servile oligarchy that abets and supports, for kickbacks, the exploitation of large-scale plantation agriculture, especially banana cultivation.... By the 1930s, the United Fruit Company owned 1,400,000 hectares (3.5 million acres) of land in Central America and the Caribbean. 

Honduras and Guatemala are cited in the article as two examples of countries in which US corporations like the United Fruit Company (now Chiquitas), and the Standard Fruit Company (now Dole) gained and have maintained major economic and political control over their host nations, often with the clandestine help of CIA and other US agencies that helped overturn governments they saw as getting in their way.

Even in Costa Rica, one of the more democratic Central American nations, Dole and other powerful corporations have managed to gain possession of huge amounts of land to make it one of the largest producers of pineapples in the world. Members of my oldest brother's family who live in the Pital region in the northeast part of the country have witnessed firsthand the takeover of hundreds of acres of good agricultural land for pineapple production. This was obtained by Del Monte from subsistence farmers who were promised good employment and a better life if they sold their property to the company. The result has been heavy truck traffic causing harm to local roads, the exploitation of local workers and a marked increase in drug use in the community. 

To the extent that we all benefit we are also all complicit. 

An Old Age Question: To Retire Or Retread?

Jimmy Carter 1924-2024

Most of us grew up fully expecting to retire at sometime around 65. This is remarkable in light of the fact that, according to one source, "... the idea of retirement is of recent origin, being introduced during the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries. Previously, low life expectancy, lack of social security and the absence of pension arrangements meant that most workers continued to work until their death. Germany was the first country to introduce retirement benefits in 1889" (Wikipedia).

Mehmet Oz, the medical doctor and administrator for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, is proposing that Americans consider working a year or more longer than the usual retirement age. Not only are most people in better health at age 65 than their counterparts a half century ago, Dr. Oz claims this would generate enough extra wealth to "remove the [national] debt" (The Jefferson City Tribune News).Should we rethink the idea of an arbitrary age for wrapping up our life work? 

I recall sociologist and preacher Tony Compolo noting that the only person in the Bible announcing his retirement is referred to as a "fool" for saying to himself, “You have plenty of goods laid up for many years. Take life easy; eat, drink and be merry” (Luke 12).

I'm inspired by the positive example of Jimmy and Rosalyn Carter, who continued to volunteer with Habitat for Humanity well into their nineties. Theirs was an expression of Jimmy's life motto: "I have one life and one chance to make it count for something... My faith demands that I do whatever I can, wherever I am, whenever I can, for as long as I can with whatever I have to try to make a difference."

Paul T. Yoder, M.D.

One of my boyhood friends, Paul T. Yoder, M.D., now in his mid-80's, is still working as a hospice care physician in LaJunta, Colorado as an extension of his life mission. The late Dr. Linford Gehman, a beloved family care physician, made house calls and provided medical care at the rural Green Valley Clinic near Bergton until he was 82. After the clinic closed in 2015 he continued to work part time at the E.A Hawse Health Center in Mathias, WV, and after that volunteered at the Harrisonburg-Rockingham Free Clinic for a number of years prior to his death at age 90.

These golden agers should serve as an inspiration to us all.

Täuferjäger (Baptist Hunters) And ICE Agents

In May, 1569,  Anabaptist Dirk Willems turned back to rescue his pursuer, a prison guard whose weight caused him to break through the ice on the frozen pond they were crossing, rather than continue his escape to freedom. Willems was apprehended and died a prolonged and excruciatingly painful death at the stake four days later.

After Anabaptists were hunted, hounded and martyred all over Europe for well over a century, a special Swiss unit was formed for the sole purpose of finally rooting out these dissenters for good.

"The operational framework for Anabaptist hunters, known as Täuferjäger, formalized in Bern during the 17th century amid ongoing resistance, with a 1669 secret government directive authorizing the recruitment of informers and bounty-hunting Täuferjäger to pursue Anabaptists in remote valleys, mountains, and forests, offering initial payments of 30 Kreuzer per captured individual funded by confiscated property. These armed envoys operated independently of local sheriffs, crossing cantonal borders to conduct house-to-house raids and interrogations, with rewards scaling to 100 talers for preachers, 50 for deacons, 30 Kronen for lay members, and 15 for women by 1714, reflecting intensified efforts after the 1659 establishment of an Anabaptist Commission to systematize arrests and property seizures. Hunters faced frequent popular sympathy for Anabaptists, as seen in a 1702 Emmental raid thwarted by community warnings via horns and shouts, and a 1714 incident in Sumiswald where 60-70 locals freed captives, underscoring tensions between state enforcers and rural populations who sheltered nonconformists."

Source: https://grokipedia.com/page/anabaptist_hunters

Sixteenth-century free church believers in western Europe who formed underground congregations separate from officially established state churches were labeled Anabaptists (re-baptizers). But their objection to state-mandated infant baptism was not just because they believed there was no New Testament basis for the practice, but because they saw it as a forced means of officially registering (documenting) people as not only citizens of the state but as members of the state-aligned church. 

Today most Christians have become totally "anabaptist" in their support of this kind of freedom of religion, but at that time everyone was either Catholic, Lutheran or Reformed based solely on the place of ones birth and residence. It was considered necessary that all citizens of the same jurisdiction belong to and to practice the same faith.

This meant that the unbaptized children of Anabaptist resisters were not only undocumented, but whole families were frequently stripped of their rights as citizens and were arrested, prosecuted and/or forced into exile. Many, like my ancestors, chose to emigrate to the new world because they could no longer find refuge and relative freedom to practice their faith without fear of being charged with crimes for doing so.

Ironically, many of our undocumented neighbors today are desperately seeking legal status as citizens, whereas our ancestors rejected being forced into becoming members of a system that failed to grant what they believed was their God-given right to choose. 

While there are many differences between circumstances in the 16th and 17th century and those of today, there are also similarities. In both scenarios the hunters are clearly on the side of following and strictly enforcing established laws, and those they were pursuing were clearly violating them.  Yet throughout the Bible, they believed, God consistently sided with the oppressed rather than with their oppressors, with the hunted rather than their hunters, as illustrated in stories of the Pharoahs, Herods and Caesars of Biblical times. And they saw far more references in the Torah, God's law, in support of welcoming refugees than even for things as basic as observing the Sabbath.

Immigrants have always been a boon to our economy, and many US Nobel prize winners have been first-generation immigrants. We have greatly benefited from welcoming good hardworking people "yearning to be free" into our communities, regardless of their faith, race or ethnic backgrounds. And Christians should be concerned that many being deported today, especially from Latin American countries, are fellow believers and that only a small percentage, from whatever countries of origin, are guilty of any crime other than their lack of, or loss of, their legal status.

Five Decades Later, This Oratorio Still Resonates

When I attended Eastern Mennonite College (now University) in the early sixties the highlight of its fall homecoming weekend was an annual performance of A. R. Gaul's oratorio "The Holy City." Nearly 200 students formed a mass choir for the cappella performance, joined by scores of alumni who returned to their alma mater to take part in this EMC tradition.

The first campus performance was in 1922, but the first annual rendition was in 1933, with a final performance in 1970. Many began to refer to EMC homecomings as "Holy City Weekend," and the chapel auditorium was typically packed for the event. 

Gaul's work was popular in the early part of the twentieth century, and included some beautiful arias and choruses based mostly on scripture texts.

Next only to Handel's Messiah, words and tunes from The Holy City still resonate in my head and occupy a large space in my heart.

In a recent visit with a fellow graduate and current  neighbor who is bedfast and in an advanced stage of cancer, I felt led to sing several memorable lines.

I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, 

Behold the tabernacle of God is with men, 

and He will dwell with them, 

and they shall be His people, 

and God shall be with them and be their God. 

And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying; nor any more pain;

for the former things have passed away. 

And I heard the voice of harpers 

harping with their harps; 

and they sang a new song 

before the throne; 

and no one could learn that song 

but they which were redeemed, 

they which were redeemed.

I could have wept. Some texts and tunes are enough to make your heart hurt.