This church owned property in Richmond is just one of many that are up for sale, this one for a mere $3,800,000. |
One of the members I spoke with afterwards lamented the fact that when he joined the church in 1972 it had some 400 members, but that today, on a good Sunday, attendance is down to around 30 or 40 congregants. A two-page directory available in the foyer listed 61 households, but fewer than half consisted of more than a single individual, and only 8 included one or more child or young adult member.
This drastic decline is concerning. Unless congregations have large endowments, they will simply not be able to continue to support a pastor and maintain what has become an oversized facility.
On the following day I attended an all day winter delegate session of our Virginia Mennonite Conference (VMC) held at the Waynesboro Mennonite Church. VMC is a part of Mennonite Church USA, a small denomination which like the much larger United Methodist Church is experiencing a major divide over the issue of accepting and affirming people in same-sex marriage and which has lost over half its membership in the past two decades. VMC has already lost numerous congregations on each side of this divide, and is almost certain to lose even more in the next few years.
Attendance and membership are also in decline in most MCUSA congregations, including the congregation that hosted the delegate session. According to an old Mennonite Yearbook I have, it had 179 members in 1979, and while I do not know what its attendance numbers were in that year, on the Sunday prior to our meeting it was 61.
I don't have any easy answers here, but the churches that are growing, unfortunately, tend to be doing so mostly from the numbers of dissatisfied people leaving other congregations rather than those becoming believers for the first time.
Maybe its time for ministers of churches to spend less time preaching from elevated pulpits and more time gathering their flock in holy huddles to do some serious soul searching about whether simply going about business as usual is really meeting their spiritual and belonging needs and those of the people in their communities.
Maybe we need to gather more frequently in circles rather than in orderly rows, and spend more time in table fellowship and less in formal gatherings where people leave the service week after week without the opportunity to disclose their deepest needs and their daily struggles.
Maybe we need sell off more of our real estate and/or to convert some of our holdings into places for feeding and housing those who need food and shelter, and for families who need day care and other services.
Maybe we need to have our weekly meetings be not just about inspirational worship but about the intensive training of the "laos" (laity, the people, including the clergy) for the life-calling and mission of Jesus, that of bringing "good news to the poor, freedom for prisoners, the recovery of sight to those who are blind (literally and figuratively), release for the oppressed and of proclaiming the year of God's favor."
Maybe we should focus less on meeting budgets to maintain our staff and facilities and for outsourcing our help through organizations and agencies, but to be engaged in freely and personally offering more of help to our neighbors across the street and around the world.
If I had my life to live over again, I believe this is where I would start. Surely people everywhere are still drawn to chosen family-like communities where they experience lots of faith, hope and love. And people still need to be empowered and blessed to love others in everyday ways that offer good news to others around them.
More like this:
...yesterday I read about a beautiful Episcopalian church that has sat vacant in Buffalo, NY for several years. It recently was sold for under $600,000 and will become apartments.
ReplyDeleteElaborate steepled facilities are being turned into restaurants, museums, coffee shops, bars and other kinds of venues, especially in urban areas. Other downtown properties are maintained for use for only an hour or so a week for a handful of worshippers. What if members of the Rochester church would leave their suburban homes and move into these kinds of apartments and start reimagining church, starting with inviting their neighbors in for coffee and conversation about things that really matter?
ReplyDeleteAnd ask, Where would Jesus live, and who would he befriend?
Our congregation is about half of what it used to be (130, down to about 55-60). We are losing older members to age and illness (and death, obviously) .... so rapidly. Post-covid, we are struggling, yet the preaching and the community vibe is strong, and have probably 20 of our members and "attenders" who watch and listen and partake on Youtube or Facebook. Thankfully we have a small number of children and wish for many more. One college student is lighting a fire of energy and love through a new housechurch which draws some of the rest of us. Other students (and teachers) help with the livestream production. We are not dead but hanging on and being inspired to live faithfully and share God's love.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comment, Melodie. Trinity is a great church!
ReplyDeleteMost of your comments here are not about submission to King Jesus and intimacy of devotion and discipleship. Your comments and maybes are about what "WE" might structure differently. Maybe it is time to stop asking questions about what we should be doing to combat the loss, divide, etc.. and start devoting ourselves to the apostles teaching, "first hand accounts of the life, ministry and Good News of Jesus!" If I could go back again, as you note, I wouldn't devote my life to a structure, I would devote my life to the Lordship of Christ. The house church model is fine and good, (one of many faithful models over the last 2000 years) but it is not the key to your question.
ReplyDeleteAt the VMC gathering you noted, a presentation noted how trying to adjust structures, to bring about a change in actions and attitudes doesn't work. Changing attitudes affects actions and then structure. Starting with structures to change our attitudes doesn't work. I appreciate your heart, but all your questions and maybes are largely about trying to adjust the structures, maybe a house church, maybe more ministry, maybe more doing, maybe a foodbank, maybe, maybe, maybe,.... Yes some Churches grow by swapping sheep and that can be rooted in consumerism, but thriving churches are less about structure and more about attitudes. The leaders and members are submitting to the lordship of Christ, their attitudes are ones of "being devoted" to Jesus! To be devoted we gladly come to learn more about Jesus, submit to his Lordship, and joyfully join in the work he is doing by his Spirit in the people. Jesus is Good News! His yoke is easy, his burden is light. Those who submit their attitudes experience joy filled discipleship and obedience to his call, teachings and commands. What happens next, what structures come, what actions fill our time as an overflow are a wonderful surprise that will blow our structured maybes out of the water.
Peter, your points are well taken, and I totally agree that changes of attitude are key, and am also sure that changes in structure may often follow, and likewise that such changes may help facilitate changes in attitudes and facilitate more intimate relationships with Jesus and with fellow members. I assume this is why your church doesn't have you and Matt speaking from an elevated pulpit, attired in clerical robes and addressed as "Reverend," and why you choose not to have pews in straight rows all facing an altar, and why you have a large, welcoming foyer and serve coffee to all comers.
ReplyDeleteI am glad to hear that changes in attitude are key - I can affirm that in what you are saying. We like to say that our mission and vision don't change, but our strategies can. One is foundational and the other is temporary.
ReplyDeleteAnd yet, we do actually preach from an elevated stage - on one hand that is simply the design of our original meeting place that we rented, and when we purchase our own facility, due to the size and shape of the room, our platform is minimally elevated. I do actually prefer the title Reverend, though I never demand or expect that title. Within the church, leadership, training, call and affirmation of the God inspired and approved mantle of leadership and authority is valuable. I am not more christian, than other members of the church, but I have been called, trained and equipped by both human and divine authority for this season, and as such I take great care and humility in filling that role. I am not defined by that role and at some point someone else will be the Lead Pastor of Eastside, I love filling the role today and I pray I get to see another ordained, affirmed and called leader filling that same role later, and hopefully for a long time. I gladly affirm that role of pastoral leadership in others as much as I accept that call on my life now. We also have straight rows, except for when our kids run through them and dislodge them.
I continue to feel as though you still misunderstand structures and systems. Christians are called to make Jesus our Lord and King and we audit our thoughts and attitudes to Jesus. Structures come after.