![]() |
Some of the 195 national flags displayed at the UN headquarters. |
Mennonite pastor and counselor Harvey Yoder blogs on faith, life, family, spirituality, relationships, values, peace and social justice. Views expressed here are his own.
Pages
Sunday, April 20, 2025
Warning And Evangelizing The Nations
Friday, April 11, 2025
It's Palm Sunday. The Crowds Are Celebrating. The Man Riding On The Donkey is Weeping.
![]() |
Entry of Christ into Jerusalem, Pietro Lorenzetti, Basilica of San Francesco d'Assisi |
Every year there is a reenactment of a story that appears in each of the four gospels, that of Jesus’ triumphal entry into Jerusalem. The annual commemoration begins in the church of Bethphage, which has a mural inside of Jesus on a donkey parading into town. From there the procession travels to the Mount of Olives, then toward the Dome of the Rock in east Jerusalem and by the Golden Gate, now closed. After going by Gethsemane they enter the city through the Lion’s Gate (or Sheep Gate, next to the market selling sheep for sacrifice) and by the Pool of Bethsaida.
As in John’s gospel the participants are waving palm branches like welcome flags, reminiscent of a scene less than two centuries before when the revolutionary Judas Maccabees entered the city in triumph, also with crowds waving palm branches welcoming him as their deliverer. This was followed by Judas cleansing the temple, something Jesus is also about to do, their pagan conquerers having defiled this holy place by sacrificing a pig on the altar.
During their brief period of independence under the Maccabeans Jews had produced their own currency, with one of their coins engraved with a palm tree and the words “for the redemption of Zion.” Before that there had been the coronation of King Jehu, with people taking off their cloaks and laying them down for the new king to walk over as he was crowned to replace King Ahab and Queen Jezebel. And before that a young Solomon was welcomed into Jerusalem to take the throne of his father David, riding on a royal donkey as a sign of peace rather than riding into town on a war horse.
Now Jesus is entering Jerusalem, having set his face toward Jerusalem during a time of his growing popularity as a teacher and miracle worker, and as the one who had just raised his friend Lazarus from the dead. It was clearly a most dangerous and volatile time for the Son of Man to visit the capital city, joining the throngs of other pilgrims coming to Jerusalem for the Passover festival. And Jesus wasn’t just met by people as he entered the city, but was surrounded by crowds of followers who were choosing to travel with him to the Passover celebration of deliverance from Egyptian oppression.
Earlier that same day, Governor Pontius Pilate had led an impressive parade of troops into the city from his headquarters in Caesarea as a show of force and as a warning to any who might dare create any kind of disturbance.
Jesus planned ahead for a different show of kingly power, arranging for borrowing someone’s young donkey to ride into the city. A crowd of followers welcome him with hosannas, literally “hosiah na,” "Lord save us, please” a part of a song of victory familiar to them all, based on Psalm 118:25-26:
So why, in light of this enthusiastic welcome, is Jesus crying, according to Luke’s account, and why doesn’t Luke even mention the hosannas? Rather, he quotes the people as proclaiming “Peace in heaven, and glory in the highest heaven.”
Luke explains it was because Jesus, then as now, is deploring the violence of empire as well as of those who opposed it, “If only you knew the things that would bring you shalom, ” he laments, and adds, “indeed the days will come when …you and your children will be crushed to the ground and they will not leave one stone on another among you, because you did not recognize the time of your visitation from God.”
Jesus, as Prince of Peace, has the words of the prophet Zechariah:9:9-10 in mind, who announced a reign of peace and the destruction of weapons of war:
Shout, Daughter Jerusalem!
See, your king comes to you,
righteous and victorious,
lowly and riding on a donkey,
on a colt, the foal of a donkey.
I will take away the chariots from Ephraim
and the warhorses from Jerusalem,
and the battle bow will be broken.
He will proclaim peace to the nations.
His rule will extend from sea to sea
and from the River to the ends of the earth.
Another author, Jason Porterfield, in the book Fight Like Jesus, draws three fundamental lessons from the Palm Sunday story:
1. Christlike peacemakers move toward conflict rather than running away from it. “We must seek out those places where God’s shalom is painfully absent. Or to use imagery Jesus used elsewhere, we must become like salt rubbed into the moral decay of society. We must become like light shining in the darkness.”
2. Christlike peacemakers extend peace to all people, friend and foe, ally and enemy. :As Zechariah predicted, Jesus rode into Jerusalem intent on removing the weapons of war. He would take away the battle bow, chariot and warhorse. And in their stead, he modeled a new way of making peace.”
3. Christlike peacemakers follow the way of the Lamb, and reject the way of the hammer. “Though they were enemies, Jesus’s admirers and Pilate’s army both believed in the power of the hammer to construct peace… Both embraced the world’s approach to peacemaking, and Jesus was confronting it head-on.”
Sunday, April 6, 2025
Heartbreaking And Hopeful Words From Inside
“Instead of wasting millions on hired labor for unnecessary, oppressive ‘security measures’ the VADOC should be using the willing skilled labor available to create a campus community with adult literacy programs, music and art programs, and critical thinking and leadership classes, all of which are proven to help break the cycle. Adding 21st century based vocational training like IT and coding would likewise be wise to supplement the existing HVAC and electrician classes which are the only real blue collar job training options.” - David Annarelli, Lawrenceville C. C.
One Parole Release in January, None In February or March
In a recent visit to Lawrenceville Correctional Center Parole Board Chair Patricia West made it clear that she will never agree to grant parole in cases where individuals have committed serious violent crimes. Period. This in spite of its mission to do for “those whose release is compatible with public safety.” This also assumes that the Department of Corrections is incapable of “correcting” the individuals it incarcerates, and that the DOC is primarily a “Department of Punishment.”
Jonathan White and a friend at Lawrenceville are proposing legislation that would require the board to base their decisions on clearly defined criteria as outlined in a 14-point “Inmate Parole Criteria Score Sheet.” The following is from their introduction to the proposed legislation:
In Virginia parole has always been recognized as a societal good by all political parties for prisoners who have demonstrated rehabilitation and pro-social positive behavior. The parole system is a reflection of the penal system functioning as an institution of reform and transformation of individuals.
However the current board’s decision making has resulted in the lowest parole grant in the history of Virginia, not a mark of distinction. For the year 2024 the grant rate was a scant .5%, a mere 16 people… In total, approximately 3,200 of 24,000 women and men are parole eligible under existing law.
The main reason for the abysmal parole rate, contrary to most people’s beliefs, is that the Board has no standard criteria for parole. Each member has their own voting concept. So for the five members there are five unknown criteria each prisoner has to overcome.
So how can the General Assembly fix the current parole voting system and ensure public safety? The answer is to release individuals who have demonstrated rehabilitation and have transformed their lives and that they will be successful returning citizens.
We need elected officials to radically change the Board’s decision-making process by passing a law that establishes a viable Static voting Criteria the Board must adhere to, one that establishes justice with fairness. The current board’s modus operandi was established in the 1940’s and is akin to boilerplate language, “Not Grant,” “Seriousness of the Crime,” etc.
All crimes are serious but these continuous decisions undermine the idea of true criminal justice reform, rehabilitation and fairness.
The common sense attached amended C.O.V. 53.1-134.2 establishes a Compulsory Parole Criteria the Board must follow:
Be it enacted by the General Assembly of Virginia: